![]() If a writing crew thinks so, in my opinion it speaks of a weak writing staff. I do not think any of the main cast of characters in a series needs to be killed. Personally, I think it was a mistake to have Nate killed. That is something every family can relate to. We also got to see the struggles of two brothers in their attempts to get along with each other. The producer who offered a “creative reason.” Really? Like the show hasn’t found lots of creative plotlines in the past 4 years without resulting to desperate measures like these.Īs for the OP’s comment “a character we all know, but probably didn’t love” - I beg to differ! I think many loved the character of Nate and could relate to his flawed and well-meaning attempts to help his brother. I see no compelling reason to kill off Nate Weston, despite those offered here. Anson, to Nate: “Enjoy the moment, Fredo.”.Sam: “I’ve never strangled a friend in cold blood before, but it’s early.” Fiona, on seeing her hidey hole: “Just me and a year’s supply of menthols, huh?”.Sam: “Barry, there’s four guys outside with guns. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |